Once upon a time, the Court gave Mommys the kids most of the time and Daddys got the kids every other weekend. If you were lucky, you might get your kid on Wednesdays to take them to dinner so you could remember what they looked like. And of course, dad had to pay mom child support, and perhaps some maintenance/alimony to keep the household afloat.
It’s a whole new world out there and being a man or a woman rarely gets you an advantage anymore in divorce or child custody cases. Modern family-law statutes and appellate decisions are written to be gender-neutral and focus on specific factors like parenting history, income, and the needs of the children.
I have had just as much success getting Fathers the children primarily as I have had with Mothers.
The mindset that children need to be with their mothers more than their fathers has been debunked many times over, and research has shown that the best chance a kid has as an adult is to have both parents extremely involved in their lives. Many states, including Missouri, expressly encourage frequent, continuing, and meaningful contact with both parents after separation.
The only time that I have really seen where gender has come into play is when a mother is breastfeeding the child, but even that is going away.
I have had more than one Judge say that there is more evidence that dad needs to be involved than there is that formula will harm a child.
The Court, at least in Missouri, tends to award a 50/50 plan for parents. In fact, if they do not give equal time, they must state a reason for it in the Judgment.
That requirement reflects a broader national push toward “best interests of the child” standards that are written to be gender-neutral and focus on stability, safety, and parental involvement rather than on whether the parent is a mother or father. While some judges may still carry old-fashioned assumptions, the law itself is not supposed to favor either parent based on gender alone.
Across the country, a lot of the perception that courts “favor” one gender or the other comes from the fact that, during the relationship, one parent was already doing more of the hands-on parenting or earning less money. When the case goes to court, that existing reality often shows up in the result, which can make it look like gender bias even when the decision is really driven by roles the couple already chose.
If you talk to enough people who have been through divorce or custody cases, you will hear very different stories about who has the “advantage.” Survey data shows that many divorced men believe courts favor women, while many women believe courts are either neutral or sometimes favor fathers. In other words, a lot of people feel like the system is stacked against them personally.
There are a few reasons those feelings are so common:
The bottom line: people’s experiences vary widely, and it is very easy to interpret a bad result as “gender bias” rather than an outcome driven by the specific facts of the case.
The same is true when it comes to child support and maintenance. I get men child support and/or maintenance all of the time.
There is no rule that men cannot get support from women. This comes down to who makes the most money, and that varies on a case-by-case basis.
So if you hear a guy say he got screwed because he is a man or a woman claim she lost because the Judge hates women, it’s more likely he lost because of other reasons (perhaps a lack of accountability for their actions).
Go into this with your eyes wide open and know that your gender has significantly less to do with your case then your actions and income do.
The same is true when it comes to child support and maintenance.
I get men child support and/or maintenance all of the time.
There is no rule that men cannot get support from women.
This comes down to who makes the most money, and that varies on a case-by-case basis. Courts look at income, earning capacity, and needs, not just whether the person asking for support is a husband or a wife.
In the big picture, women still receive support more often than men, but that is largely because women, on average, still earn less than men and are more likely to have taken time out of the workforce to care for children. As more households have female primary earners or equal earners, it is increasingly common to see husbands receive maintenance or child support when the wife earns substantially more.
So if you hear a guy say he got screwed because he is a man or a woman claim she lost because the Judge hates women, it’s more likely he lost because of other reasons (perhaps a lack of accountability for their actions).
Go into this with your eyes wide open and know that your gender has significantly less to do with your case than your actions and income do.
Some of the factors that matter far more than whether you are a mom or a dad include:
If you want to improve your odds, it usually makes more sense to focus on strengthening those areas than on arguing that the judge is automatically going to favor the other gender.
The plan that I have seen work best is the 2-2-5-5 schedule, where Parent A has the children every Monday and Tuesday overnight, and Parent B has the children every Wednesday and Thursday overnight.
They then alternate who gets the kids for Friday, Saturday, and Sunday overnight. So each parent has the kids for two nights, then the next time is for five nights.
This makes planning a lot easier, as you know exactly what night you will have the children. It is also easier on the children as they know that on X days they go to mom or dad’s house. For many families, it also cuts down on conflict because there is less arguing over “who gets which weekend” and more predictability for everyone’s work, school, and activity schedules.
To clear up some confusion, here are a few common myths I hear all the time:
Whether you are a mother or a father, there are practical steps you can take to give yourself the best chance at a fair, child-focused outcome:
When you focus on what you can control—your conduct, your documentation, and your preparation—you give yourself a much better chance than simply worrying about whether the court “likes” moms or dads more.
Apr 1st, 2026
Child Custody, Child Support, Divorce, Modification
Mar 3rd, 2026
Divorce Mediation, Divorce Mediations, Divorce Process, Family Law
Dec 10th, 2025
Child Custody, Child Support, Divorce, Divorce Preparation